In an example of typical EU government overreach, Apple has confirmed that its new iPhone 15 will use a USB-C cable instead of its proprietary lightning charging port, complying with EU regulations.
"The EU had told the tech giant to ditch its proprietary charging ports to make life easier for consumers, save them money, and help reduce e-waste by encouraging re-use of chargers. "
This move is intended to standardize charging across devices and reduce electronic waste, but to use their accessories, iPhone 15 owners will have to buy a clunky lightening adaptor. No waste there… and clearly making consumers’ lives easier.
In the end, just more money for Apple, like always.
I live in Europe. I like the lightening charger. It fits into the phone either way so it is never upside down. It feels more elegant and solid than USB. I have bought several cheap imitation cables on Amazon and they work fine.
The EU is somehow protecting me from having to use this cable. If I didn’t like the cable, I would have bought a different phone. These types of things really make me miss the US. I can’t get used to the government interfering in my life for my own good.
But pre-school is 50 bucks a month here, health insurance is cheap and great, and college is free… so whatever. I’m not leaving.
As the Eagles said, “Every form of refuge has its price”
At first glance, discussing Apple’s charger change might seem unwarranted for this forum.
Why bother posting about Apple’s decision to ditch its lightning charger for USB-C on a digital Davos forum? At first, it might seem irrelevant, given the forum’s focus on global economic and social issues. But upon reflection, this seemingly small tech development reveals crucial insights:
-
ESG Influence: It shows how ESG concerns are reshaping corporate strategies. The EU’s mandate reflects the growing impact of environmental, social, and governance factors on product design and business decisions.
-
Environmental Significance: This shift highlights the environmental dimension of ESG. The EU’s goal to reduce electronic waste underscores how regulatory actions can drive positive sustainability outcomes.
-
Consumer vs. Sustainability: It sparks a debate about the balance between consumer convenience and sustainability, a broader discussion within the ESG framework.
-
Corporate Response: Apple’s response, with its environmental pledges, exemplifies how businesses are adapting to the ESG landscape, aligning their goals with principles of sustainability and social responsibility.
In sum, this seemingly minor tech update is a valuable case study at the crossroads of technology, sustainability, and regulation—central topics for Davos discussions. It reminds us that even seemingly insignificant tech decisions can have far-reaching implications, making it a relevant subject for a digital Davos forum